Open Letter to the UP Community on the Proposed Tuition Fee Increase

Friday, December 8, 2006
UP President Emerlinda R. Roman

When I assumed my post as UP president, I announced, as part of my ten-point plan, the review of our existing undergraduate tuition policy and structure. Even then, I acknowledged that it would be a “tough decision,” and determined that it would involve studying how financial responsibility could be shared among our different stakeholders. (University of the Philippines Plan, 2005-2011)

Shortly after that, I created a committee for this purpose, headed by Dr. Emmanuel De Dios of the UP Diliman School of Economics. The committee has completed its work and submitted its report. Copies of the complete report have been distributed to all CUs. A primer, containing a simple summary of the report’s most important points, has also been widely distributed.

I also created another committee, headed by Professor Edgardo Atanacio of the UP Diliman College of Engineering, to propose a restructuring of the Socialized Tuition and Financial Assistance Program (STFAP), based on the De Dios Report. This committee has also submitted its final report, and copies have been sent to the chancellors, the Faculty Regent, the Student Regent and the Alumni Regent.

As expected, some students are opposed to the proposed tuition adjustments. Had there been no opposition at all, we would have been surprised, even perhaps disappointed. What would UP be like without debates? However, because public statements have been made which—deliberately or unconsciously—contain distortions of the facts, I wish to take this opportunity to clarify the issue.

This proposed tuition adjustment is the first since 1989. Under the proposed adjustment, the cost per unit in UP Diliman, UP Manila and UP Los BaƱos will be P1,000. In UP Baguio, UP Visayas and UP Mindanao, it will be P600.

The reason for the proposed adjustment is inflation. The P300 per unit which UP students are paying today is worth only P98 today. If we were to take the actual rate of increase of prices for educational services in particular, it is worth even less—P42. As pointed out by Professor Solita Monsod, “this means that the UP student on the average is being subsidized for about 80% of the cost of instruction. (PDI, 18 November)

Miscellaneous fees will also be adjusted to reflect rising costs, from around P600 to P2000 for UPD, UPM and UPLB; from P595 to P1405 for UPB and UPV; and from P830 to P1,640 for UP Mindanao.

One very important detail which protesting students often ignore is that the new fees will affect only new students, i.e., freshmen and transferees, who will enter UP in 2007. Moreover, only students belonging to the highest income bracket—Bracket A (over P1 million a year)—will pay the full rate (the base tuition of P1,000 per unit x 1.5). In fact, students eligible for assistance under the UP Socialized Tuition and Financial Assistance Program (STFAP) will enjoy larger benefits.

Students in Bracket E (annual income of P80,000 or less) will pay no tuition at all, and will receive a stipend of P12,000 per semester. Students in Bracket D (annual income from P80,001 to P135,000) will enjoy a 70% discount, which means they will pay P300 per unit, the existing rate. Students in Bracket C (annual income from P135,001 to P500,000) will pay P600 per unit. Only those in Bracket B (annual income of P500,001 to P1 million) will pay P1,000 per unit.

It should be noted that this bracketing is different from the old one, so to claim, as UPD student council chair Juan Paulo Alfonso does, that under the old bracketing, 3 out of 9 income groupings are given full subsidy, whereas under the new one, only one will get it, is an oversimplification.

For example, under the existing STFAP, ownership of a cell phone automatically places the student in Bracket 9. Under the proposed STFAP, a cell phone will be considered just an addition to the number of phones a family has. It is families with swimming pools, private security services, international credit cards, and personally-financed travels which will be assigned to Bracket A.

Additionally, the adjusted fees remain significantly lower than the true cost of an undergraduate UP education, not to mention the cost of an undergraduate education in other comparable universities in the country.

Finally, alongside the tuition adjustment and the revised STFAP, we intend to: (1) strengthen the student loan program; (2) increase the number of student assistance posts; and (3) campaign for more scholarship grants from the government, the private sector, and the alumni.

Mr. Alfonso, has been quoted as saying that it is wrong to use students as a “source of income” for the university. “They tell us that it’s not the government’s role to subsidize tertiary education, but we believe otherwise.” (PDI, 24 November). During the congress of student councils held in Davao, which I personally attended, Mr. Alfonso declared that the difference between the students’ position and that of the UP administration was “philosophical.” In other words, their position is that tertiary education should be entirely subsidized. But, as Professor Randy David has observed, while basic education is indeed a right, enshrined in the Constitution, tertiary education is not. (PDI, 26 November)

In any case, we have never suggested that state subsidies for education should be removed. What we have done is recognize they are diminishing, not just nationally, but globally. Nonetheless, UP students coming from families up to the 97th percentile of the national income distribution (maximum annual family income of P500,000) shall continue to enjoy a tuition subsidy even under the restructured STFAP.

Nor have we any intentions of forgetting about the need to get a larger budget from government. Our position is simply that while waiting for this miracle to take place, we cannot simply stand our ground and do nothing.

Even while the two committees were conducting their studies, we were working on a three-pronged program to improve the University’s finances: (1) the UP Centennial Fund Campaign, designed to build up our financial endowment; (2) the aggressive campaign in Congress and the Senate, to secure exemption from the Salary Standardization Law for the UP faculty, and additional funding for UP programs and projects; and (3) the negotiations with Ayala Land, Inc. for the development of the UP North Science and Technology Park along Commonwealth Avenue.

I might add that we have been successful in obtaining P500 million from the supplemental budget for the National Science Complex, through the good offices of Congressman Luis Villafuerte and Senator Franklin Drilon; and that we have signed the Memorandum of Agreement with ALI for the S&T Park. Governments all over the world have recognized the all-important link between scientific expertise and economic development, and universities have set up S&T Parks adjacent to their campuses. The S&T Park, which will soon rise on our campus, is not only an important part of our efforts to address the University’s financial needs, but fits right in with our vision of UP as being at par with the leading research universities around the world.

It is to be hoped that the sectors that are now loudly objecting to our proposed adjustment of student fees, and insisting that we find more “creative” ways of compensating for our budgetary constraints, will not be as vociferous in objecting to our efforts to become more financially independent by developing our idle assets. Or, at the very least, that they will first examine the Q&A on the S&T Park prepared by the Office of the Vice President for Development, and published in the UP Newsletter, October and November issues, and also available on line.

Atty. Gari Tiongco, president of the UP Alumni Association, and also a member of the UP Board of Regents, has endorsed the tuition adjustment. So have the faculty members of some of the colleges in UP Diliman. I hope other members of the UP community will at least study the proposal carefully, before proclaiming their opposition to it.

In the meantime, we in administration must continue to do our jobs and run the University as best we can under the circumstances.
----------
from the UP Website

I'm a Narcissist...so?

  • An excessive preoccupation with one’s own personal importance, or with achieving one’s own chosen goals rather than bonding with others, or with associating only with others whom one chooses.

  • The ability to be stimulated by one's own body. Most people have this ability as a normal property.

  • self-love: an exceptional interest in and admiration for yourself
    wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

  • Narcissism is the pattern of characteristics and behaviors which involve infatuation and obsession with one's self to the exclusion of others and the egotistic and ruthless pursuit of one's gratification, dominance and ambition. In everyday use outside the field of psychology, the word generally refers to people who just are inordinately fond of themselves, without the pathological connotations.
  • I was reading Youngstar last night and something caught my attention... this woman started her article with the statement that she rarely or at least try to not write using the pronoun "I" because she didn't want to be associated with those "narcissistic bloggers" who only talk about themselves. I felt sort of offended by such statement because I wrote a reaction regarding the same topic a few years ago and I am firm in my stand that narcissism is not a bad thing and people have the freedom to talk about themselves and to love themselves if they want to without being judged as someone who doesn't care about other people.

    Narcissism as defined above need not be a negative characteristic if it's with moderation. I know that strictly speaking, Narcissism is sort of an "extreme characteristic" but if it's in the context of a normal person, i see narcissism as "embracing one's being and accepting yourself as someone who is at par with everybody else". I know it's kind of a cliche but it's not everyday that you see someone who is ready to flaunt herself together with her bad side. I'm not saying that we should glorify even these bad traits but we must admit that we are a totality of all the good things and the bad things that comprise our personality.

    Now, moving on to the more pertinent issue of whether or not one must be judged for being a "NARCISSISTIC BLOGGER". There is a genre called Creative Non-fiction, [a creative writing subject which i took under Ms. Fernandez when I was still in UPdiliman] and this genre for me is a good guise for writers who have a lot of things to share and are just sort of afraid that they'll be wrongly construed as "narcissistic". One of the most important characteristics of a good writer is his/ her ability to write about things that are close to him or her. That "personal touch", that "sentimental value" that you get when you talk about your personal experiences draws the readers closer to you not only as a writer but as an "invisible friend." That for me is the most wonderful thing about being able to blog... It's a shotgun approach of connecting with people whom are very different from you at some aspects but who can relate to you in at least one aspect. One's experience no matter how personal sometimes are triggered by the most general things. They're all triggered by emotions that are felt by everyone whose heart beats, who breathes and who just plainly watches the world pass him by.

    The personal touch that a "narcissistic blogger" may sometimes be the same "reason" why people get interested. The honesty that comes with talking about yourself, what you feel what you think and what you experience is the same honesty that people hold on to.

    Narcissism is not a negative adjective if you'll ask me. After all, my world revolves around me as the sun and how my warmth [or heat, hehe] affect the other astrological bodies [other people] whom I interact with.

    I'm a Narcissist. So?


    Let me end with this interesting quote from Ally Mc Beal:



    Georgia Thomas: Ally, what makes your problems so much bigger than everybody else's?
    Ally McBeal: They're mine.

    Shoot that Ball, Marlon...

    One of my high school friends unfortunately met an accident the other day at C5 and passed away. It still troubles me that three of my friends died in a short period of time. It's like a reminder of how short life is, or of how important it is to live your life like you'll never live the next day. It's a warning, it's also a demonstration of how shaky reality is.

    I'm going to his wake tonight and I will be seeing people whom I havent seen in really LOOONG while. It's sad that these things happen as a tool for people to remember how it all started.

    Death is such an inconsistent word. It connotes sadness but at the same time connotes that "hope" that things'll be better from then on.

    Marlon... play basketball with Jesus now. I'm cheering you on from down here.

    See You on Saturday is CRAP

    I am totally hating PLDT for doing this to me. It's been almost a month now [i might be exaggerating a bit] since my landline got all "effed up" and I am totally experiencing an involuntary withdrawal syndrome. I miss blogging and I miss lurking and I miss everything that is CYBER. No, not THAT "cyber". THey promised to repair it last Saturday but not even a single strand of hair from anyone of the people from PLDT emerged. I miss my "pseudo- SOCIAL LIFE."

    A lot has been happening in my life and as much as I want to type err, write, err divulge all these really juicy tsismis, mishaps, tragedies... I can't! My time is limited. So, this entry is just my way of saying that PLDT is messing with my life. [ROmeo and Juliet tone].

    Anyways, I cut my bangs again. It's the Anne Curtis slash Yasmin Kurdi slash "pero mataba ka" bangs. My friends say that I look like someone from a Koreanovela. THat's the goal. Princess Hours has been influencing my mood these past few days and I am now officially declaring that I'm looking for my Own PRINCE. May he be like Gian or Troy, it doesnt matter. THe operative word is, "PRINCE."

    Let me end this "BS" entry by saying that I am happy, and that my life has been peaceful and that though I start the 2007 with a bumpy, rocky, shitty and really messy disposition, I am slowly but surely starting to be more stable. As if that is possible.

    To My Drunk Brother... and to all Exclusive-Daters

    ... my brother went out last night to meet up with his friends and went home at around 2am only to bug me and my sister. How? Well, he asked us questions nobody dared to ask anyone in our family. Kadiri. My brother was so persistent in asking for the names of the guys who got "involved in the web that is the Monsod Sister's lovelife". We didnt really name names but after finding out that we had quite a number of names in our list, he shouted... "Hoy, and tatanda nyo na wala pa kayong sinasagot ni isa? PLAYERS!"

    I swear, my family's the craziest. He kept on teasing us about our "love lives" that we ended up bullying him into finally sleeping. I cannot disclose what transpired in our conversation but uhmm, Kadiri talaga.

    It just got me into thinking of the now popular phrase, "EXCLUSIVELY DATING". It's like a more sophisticated and sosyal monicker for "Em-Yu" or Mutual Understanding. I saw kasi the pictures of this guy whom I am [fine, i decided a few minutes ago that it's gonna be "was"] dating with another girl that he's not exclusively dating, like me and well, I don't think I will ever say that I'm exclusively dating anyone. It's too pretentious kasi at this point in my life to say that im not looking for someone whom i can exclusively date. La lang. Namiss ko mag-blog e. Kahit walang point magsusulat parin ako.

    Sa huli kasi, ang point ng lahat ng ito e, wala parin akong "LOVE LIFE" sa technical na definition nito. 2007 na. Payn, law school muna.

    I haven't been blogging...

    ... not because not a lot of things've been happening in my life.
    ... not because I'm having a "pseudo-writer's block"
    ... not because I'm busy with my "social life"
    ... not because I'm dating a lot of guys. [I'd love to... and well, yeah I've been dating.. but NOT A LOT of GUYS. No "exclusively dating" questions please.
    ... not because I simply don't want to.
    ... not because I'm being my crazy self.
    ... not because I have broken my vow to help Jessica Zafra with her plan of WORLD DOMINATION.

    BUT because my freakin' landline's not working since December 23. I've been [actually, my tito] doing a lot of following up with PLDT and well, all they gave us are PROMISES that it shall be ok soon and that we won't have to pay for our December bill. I am a willing consumer, now GIVE ME MY PRODUCT please!

    Formal is blah...

    ... but I love it.

    I love things that are complicated. I love the hassle. I love exerting effort.

    I feel like a "princess" again. I love the feeling of my "gown's sashaying to the beat of the music around me". I love it that I have to go to a wedding today only one day after I went to my law school's ball. There is continuity, it's like I'm living in a fairytale.

    Btw, we had our annual staff christmas party last night and I must say that I had so much fun. Especially because our employess brought their kids with them and anyone who knows me KNOWS that I L-O-V-E KIDS. I just get sooo emotionally-attached all the time. I distributed and got to choose which toys to give 'em. The smiles, the hugs, the laughter, all the childish and child-like banters... I SIMPLY ADORE. My heart was bursting with happiness just because these kids are around me. The look of amusement in their eyes is just PRICELESS. My Christmas Break is turning out to be such a FAIRYTALE.

    Special thanks to Chubs for inviting me to his barkada's Christmas Party slash Get-together. That was so sweet of you dear. I really wanted to go, I just couldn't miss the Staff Christmas Party mentioned above because well, without these people, I wouldn't be living the life that I've been living. hehe. Sayang, I wanted to see cousin Jeff, Jofel, Carlo and you sana, next time talaga.

    Keepin' the "BALL" Rolling...






    -----------------
    patikim pa lang yan Haze. =P

    STATEMENT ON THE DECEMBER 15, 2006 INCIDENT AT MALCOLM HALL

    LAW STUDENT GOVERNMENT
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES COLLEGE OF LAW

    STATEMENT ON THE DECEMBER 15, 2006 INCIDENT AT MALCOLM HALL

    Last December 15, 2006, a group of UP students with strong anti-tuition fee
    increase sentiments, barged through the doors of Malcolm Hall, in search of
    members of the University of the Philippines Board of Regents. The group was
    headed by the Student Regent, and the University Student Council. Such
    students verbally assaulted members of the UP Law Student Government and the
    UP Law community who were at that time peacefully preparing for "Malcolm
    Madness", the College's Christmas program. In the attempt to find the
    regents, these students harassed practically everyone who was foreign to
    them including the UP Law Center staff, the UP Law Personnel and fellow UP
    students. They were hurling accusations such as, "Tinatago n'yo sila!"
    "Niloko n'yo kami!" "Bakit n'yo kami pinagtatagksilan? !" at the members UP
    Law community who were in sight. During the height of turmoil, a student of
    the College was pushed to the door of the Malcolm Theater in her attempt to
    ward off the rallyists from entering the Theater, wherein there were
    students preparing for the College program; a handful of other students were
    likewise emotionally traumatized. It was only after a five-minute, initially
    adversarial dialogue between the Student Regent and the Law Student
    Government President that the angry crowd was asked by their leaders to turn
    around and leave. Unfortunately, however, the injury had already been
    inflicted. Aside from emotional and physical injuries, the mob ultimately
    left the college with property damaged, specifically the door of Malcolm
    Hall and the Malcolm driveway was splashed with red paint. Furthermore, the
    "Malcolm Madness" was cancelled for the first time since its inception,
    causing losses for equipment rentals and decoration costs on the part of the
    UP Law students and the UP Law Student Government.

    It is understandable that these students may have had strong sentiments
    against the Tuition Fee Increase issue. After all, they are entitled to
    express their vehement objections to the Board of Regents in accordance with
    their constitutional right to free speech and expression. However such forms
    of expression are never justifications to trample on others' rights to
    safety of their persons and property.

    Thus, it is with a heavy heart that we, the Law Student Government, condemn
    this chaotic incident initiated by our fellow UP students. We believe that
    their acts have crossed the borderline of freedom of expression as it
    tramples on propriety, ethics and any notion of reason. We have no choice
    but to respond accordingly - as of all institutions, the UP College of Law
    and the UP Law student Government will not tolerate exploits of such kind.
    In verbally and physically hurting other people and destroying property,
    these acts are no less than criminal.

    We hold the Student Regent responsible for inciting this mob and leading it
    into our college with no sense of direction or restraint according to the
    purpose by which it was gathered. We implead him primarily for being the
    proximate cause of the incident, without regard for those who do not share
    his agenda.

    We hold the members of the University Student Council responsible, most
    especially the USC Chair, according to the principle of command
    responsibility. The Chair was not present during the incident; the members
    of the USC who were in attendance did nothing to pacify the crowd during the
    height of chaos. We deem that they should have reasonably anticipated such
    consequences when a group of extremely emotionally charged individuals
    rally: chaos will definitely result from the mob rule - despite lack of
    premeditated ill intentions to inflict harm on others.

    As veterans of mass action protests, the Student Regent and the University
    Student Council should have foreseen harmful results and consequently
    formulated and implemented proactive safeguards to avoid or minimize them.
    The damages caused by these acts of omission were not rectified by belated
    measures to make the crowd turn back. Such conduct of the USC betrays the
    very office that they occupy. Beyond advocacies, the primary accountability
    of the USC belongs to the UP populace, whose safety, welfare and well-being
    they ought to have upheld - whichever side of the fence the constituent-
    students sit in an issue.

    We, too, in the UP Law Student Government, are scholars of the people. Like
    every UP Student, we are being educated to become productive members of
    society who are reflective of the ideals of the nation. We believe that the
    UP student has brilliant ideas and opinions, which have to be voiced out in
    a reasonable manner. Thus do we champion the spirit of activism, one of the
    forces for which our University is distinctly renowned. It is in this spirit
    that we, ourselves, participate in various rallies, fora and social action
    in the midst of various issues of public interest. Yet, we condemn riotous
    and anarchical modes of activism. No matter how noble the purpose or ends of
    a rally, mutinous styles of mass action will NEVER be justified, especially
    when they infringe on others' safety of their persons and property. Though
    we, ourselves, are activists in our own right, we will never allow activism
    to cast a dark shadow on the conduct and character of the UP students.

    We, in the UP College of Law, denounce the December 15, 2006 incident in
    Malcolm Hall. We deem that it is only just and equitable that those at its
    helm be held responsible for its outcome. We condemn all types and kinds of
    abuses of the spirit of activism, which has been enshrined in the history of
    our university. Relentlessly, we will cling to our bias for order, propriety
    and the rule of law.

    Di Kami Lasing...

    ... tipsy lang.

    Went to The Fort last night until the wee hours of the morning to celebrate the start of our "Christmas Vacation".

    My Law school barkada otherwise known as DuhPerm was sort of complete with a few new Drinking buddies. Ok, Roll Call: Euns, Shem, Rica, Yvie, JV, Mel, Juancho, Ana, David, Pepe, Kiboy, Haze, Elliot, Rachelle, Ces, Kiko, Becky, Chris, Anton, Patty... Much Love Guys!!!!

    Koko, Lew at Carlo... Boo! =P Namiss namin kayo a.

    Our first plan was to spend the night at CocoCabana but it was jampacked and we felt like it was hopeless and futile to wait for the people to leave. So, we went to The Fort instead and tried our luck at Pier One. Ang masasabi ko lang... Haha. Luck my ass. We still waited for a looong time before we got a table, but I don't regret going there naman. I had fun.

    We bumped din into other law students at The Fort and a lot of kwentuhans later, we FINALLY STARTED THE HIGHLY-ANTICIPATED DRINKING SESSION. Because I vowed, we all vowed not to talk about what "transpired" and "got revealed" during Kiboy's "15 Questions Game", I will not divulge any incriminating facts about the people who were game enough to answer the VERY CONTROVERSIAL QUESTIONS. *Winks at Patty, Ces, Chris, Elliot, Anton, Juancho, Kiko, Becky, Mel, Haze and Rach. Kaya TAP-OUT ako jan. hehe.

    May mga nagkahamunan mag-holding hands, may mga nagkahamunan mag-date, may nagkahamunan lang basta... may nagkakadevelopan, may nag-break at nakamove on, may "nag-footsie", nag-PDA, nag-hug at kung anu-ano pa. Bahala na kayo. Basta, sobrang eventful ng inuman na'to.

    Thanks Yvie for the wonderful pashmina shawls [tama ba un spelling ng pashmina?]. You're welcome Pepe. Carlo, BOOOOO! =P

    Then we went to Starbucks a li'l tipsy, a li'l happier, a li'l excited... itinuloy ang kwentuhan at nag-uwian na may mga ngiti sa mga labi.

    MERRY CHRISTMAS GUYS!!!!




    Boyet, Maria, Alexis, Ula, T.E. ... Para Sa'yo.

    ALEXIS na BRUSKONg-BRUSKO

    jersee_d_goddess : pinapadepress mo ko bigla ha. [mali yata un tagalog na un] pinapa-depress? may ganun ba?
    elliotdemanila : tila pinu-puno kita ng pighati
    jersee_d_goddess : hahaha..babalik nanaman ba tayo sa tagalog? mahilig ka sa ganyan. "makata".
    elliotdemanila : Then I beseech you to utilize your grasp of the English language
    jersee_d_goddess : gawd. Language-swings. kaw lang may ganung topak a.
    elliotdemanila : Preferez-vous la langue Francais?
    jersee_d_goddess : Fine, fine. I get your point. You're Multilingual... Show-off!
    elliotdemanila : hinde. nakuha ko lang communication skills ko kakapanood ng Ana Luna at Eat Bulaga noong bata pa ako. At ngayon, sa The Buzz nalang ako kumukuha ng pointers.
    jersee_d_goddess : Haha, speaking of Ana Luna.. alam mo ba, dati akala ko ako si Eunice [un kontrabida] kasi Elvie din pangalan nun mom ko.. so, i got carried aawy at sinabihan ko un yaya ko na.. "Sampid ka lang dito!" gaga no?
    elliotdemanila : Dapat di mo na kinwento sakin yan. patay ka sakin bukas
    jersee_d_goddess : haha.. siraulo. pagbaabayaran ko ba ang mga kakontrabidahan ko?
    elliotdemanila : alam mo naman na ikaw lang ang eula valdes ng buhay ko
    jersee_d_goddess : shit. salamt Elliot. im soo honored. eula eh no.
    elliotdemanila : at ako naman si claudine, kaya sakin ang huling halak-hak. grabe ang jologs ko.
    jersee_d_goddess: di sakin nanggaling yan.
    jersee_d_goddess : pero teka, si Kristine Hermosa ka.. tapos si Jean Garcia ako..un ang mas tama
    elliotdemanila: pwede bang rico yan nalang? puro babae nababangit dito!
    elliotdemanila : ...on second thought, jericho rosales nalang. nasa langit na pala si rico.
    jersee_d_goddess: hahaha.. Fine, fine fine. pero di na ako kontrabida nun, anak na kita.
    elliotdemanila : o di ikaw nalang si puma lay-ar at ako si alexis/shaider
    jersee_d_goddess : bwahahaha... tumutugtog sa isip ko un shigi shigi
    elliotdemanila : o siya, papanik na ako sa babilos at ako'y matutulog na. baka magalit si ani.
    jersee_d_goddess : night.

    ---------------------------
    MAKATANG BOYET

    elliotdemanila : Magandang gabi. May pasok ba bukas sa PIL or submission lang ng digests? And kailangan ba i-print yung digests?
    jersee_d_goddess : may pasok sa PIL. at oo kailangan iprint ang digest.
    jersee_d_goddess : didnt u get the text message?
    elliotdemanila : Hindi po namin natangap ang mga mensahe. Akala ko pa naman at walang pampublikong batas pangkalawakan bukas. Inubos ng mga kaso ang oras ko. Maraming salamat sa iyong pagtitiwala
    jersee_d_goddess : walang anuman, nawa'y tuluyan kang naliwanagan sa mga agam-agam na naglalaro sa iyong isipan. Magandang gabi...
    elliotdemanila : Magandang gabi rin at sana'y sing tamis ng mansanas ni eba ang iyong mga panaginip

    -----------------------
    MARIA, The Diamond Star

    Pero ang pinakamatindi sa lahat ay ang pagwa-walkout ni Maria sa kanyang self-produced episode ng Maricel Drama Special nang sinubukan namin na pakantahin sya sa Christmas Party.

    The Elevator Groupie

    We are all made to believe that we should be headed in the same direction, inside a seemingly restrictive box that gives us free will a...